What does a heist reveal about bank design? What can architects learn from a prison break? What happens when we view the criminal act as an especially transgressive mode of architectural criticism? Crime has the potential to reveal new facets of architecture. It exposes unexpected spatial narratives and subverts conventional readings of the designed environment. Crime undermines the implicit formal and programmatic optimism in any architectural plan or program. It also makes for a hell of a movie.
The relationship between crime and architecture is an issue I’ve been exploring over the last year in both my personal work and as co-organizer of the 2011 Yale School of Architecture research colloquium Space, Crime, and Architecture, as well as its complementary symposium, Fugitive Geographies. While there may be countless articles and theories dating back to at least the 18th century that explore these issues, in my experience one of the most effective –and fun!– ways to discuss them is through an analysis of their depictions in popular media. So I’m really looking forward to Breaking Out and Breaking In, an architectural “distributed film festival” of Prison Break and Heist films sponsored by BLDGBLOG, Filmmaker Magazine, and Studio-X:
Watch the films at home—or anywhere you may be—and then come back to discuss the films here on BLDGBLOG. It’s a “distributed” film fest; there is no central venue, just a curated list of films and a list of days on which to watch them. There’s no set time, no geographic exclusion, and no limit to the food breaks or repeated scenes you might require. And it all leads up to a public discussion at Studio-X NYC on Tuesday, April 24.
The overall idea is to discuss breaking out and breaking in as spatial scenarios that work as mirror images of one another, each process with its own tools, techniques, and unique forms of unexpected architectural expertise.
How do prisoners and burglars reinterpret the built environments around them? Where does this more aggressive understanding of space differ from the constructive insights of an architect—and how can a building be strategically unbuilt so as to get at what lies on the other side? What particular kinds of spatial and temporal knowledge—where to tunnel, when to go—do these other users of buildings need to develop?
Breaking Out and Breaking In is currently underway but it’s not too late to follow along! I expect to be joining the conversation in the comments section over at BLDGBLOG and, in a few weeks, will hopefully have an essay or two of my own to contribute in a more official capacity. For more information on the event and examples of architectural heists see the full announcement at BLDGBLOG.
Billboards Are Almost All Right
Meanwhile, on twitter…
Recent Life Without Buildings Posts
- Buzzing: Star Wars: The Force Awakens at Comic-Con: What you’ll see … and what you won’t
- Buzzing: Heavy Metal is getting a punk rock facelift under new editor Grant Morrison
- Buzzing: Amy Schumer is ‘taking responsibility’ for controversial joke
- Buzzing: Inside Out finally beat Jurassic World at the box office
- Fulton Center is built in a transit vernacular that extrapolates the charm of a subway car to the scale and complexity of a Piranesian prison.
- Architecturally Ghostbusting World War II Bunkers
- The Map-maker of Gotham City
- Dr. No, Die Hard, and Deleuze: Mechanical Spaces and Movies
- From Bauhaus to Dollhouse: When Architects Think Small