The Architecture of Chess

chess architecture
Daniel Weil’s Staunton design was inspired by the Parthenon (image: Design Week)

Prior to 1849, there was no such thing as a “normal chess set.” At least not like we think of it today. Over the centuries that chess had been played, innumerable varieties of sets of pieces were created, with regional differences in designation and appearance. As the game proliferated throughout southern Europe in the early 11th century, the rules began to evolve, the movement of the pieces were formalized, and the pieces themselves were drastically transformed from their origins in 6th century India. Originally conceived of as a field of battle, the symbolic meaning of the game changed as it gained popularity in Europe, and the pieces became stand-ins for a royal court instead of an army. Thus, the original chessmen, known as counselor, infantry, cavalry, elephants, and chariots, became the queen, pawn, knight, bishop, and rook, respectively. By the 19th century, chess clubs and competitions began to appear all around the world, it became necessary to use a standardized set that would enable players from different cultures to compete without getting confused.

In 1849, that challenge would be met by the “Staunton” Chess Set.

The Staunton chess pieces are the ones we know and love today, the ones we simply think of as chess pieces. Prior to their debut in 1849, there were a wide variety of popular styles in England, such as  The St. George, The English Barleycorn, and the Northern Upright. To say nothing of the regional and cultural variations. But the Staunton quickly would surpass them all. Howard Staunton was a chess authority who organized many tournaments and clubs in London, and was widely considered to be one of the best players in the world. Despite its name, the iconic set was not designed by Howard Staunton.

A drawing of typical balusters; possible inspiration for the Staunton Pawn (image: wikimedia commons)

According to the most widely told origin story, the Staunton set was designed by architect Nathan Cook, who looked at a variety of popular chess sets and distilled their common traits while also, more importantly, looking at the city around him. Victorian London’s Neoclassical architecture had been influenced by a renewed interest in the ruins of ancient Greece and Rome, which captured the popular imagination after the rediscovery of Pompeii in the 18th century. The work of architects like Christopher WrenWilliam ChambersJohn Soane, and many others inspired the column-like, tripartite division of king, queen, and bishop. A row of Staunton pawns evokes Italianate balustrades enclosing of stairways and balconies.

Head of a horse of Selene from the east pediment of the Parthenon. The likely inspiration for the Staunton knight. (image: British Museum)
Head of a horse of Selene from the east pediment of the Parthenon. The likely inspiration for the Staunton knight. (image: British Museum)

And the knight, the most intricate and distinct piece of any chess set, is unique in that it’s the only piece that is not an abstracted representation of a designation; it’s a realistically carved horse head. The Staunton Knight was likely inspired by a sculpture on the east pediment of the Parthenon depicting horses drawing the chariot of Selene, the Moon Goddess. Selene’s horse is part of a collection of sculptures controversially removed from the Parthenon by Thomas Bruce, the 7th Earl of Elgin, during his tenure as ambassador to the Ottoman court. Known as the “Elgin Marbles,” these sculptures were donated to the British Museum in 1816 and were enormously popular with a British public that was growing increasingly interested in classical antiquities. According to the British Museum, Selene’s horse “is perhaps the most famous and best loved of all the sculptures of the Parthenon. It captures the very essence of the stress felt by a beast that has spent the night drawing the chariot of the Moon across the sky….the horse pins back its ears, the jaw gapes, the nostrils flare, the eyes bulge, veins stand out and the flesh seems spare and taut over the flat plate of the cheek bone.” Now you know why the knights in your chess sets always look like they’re screaming in agony.

Recently, the Staunton set got a makeover. The new piece designs are part of an earlier project by noted design conultancy Pentagram, the rebranding of World Chess, an organization that aims to bring chess back to a level of popularity it enjoyed during the heyday of Bobby Fischer. Other than coming up with a new brand and identity for chess, Pentagram also designed a new tv-friendly competitive playing environment and an interactive website that lets fans follow games live online via “chesscasting”.

Daniel Weil, partner of Pentagram, reinterpreted the classic Staunton set for the 2013 World Chess Candidates Tournament in London. Weil says that to begin the project he had to “unravel the rationale behind the original set.” This meant looking back to the pieces’ origins in Neoclassical architecture. Following the lead of Cook, Weil also looked to the Parthenon (see top image). As part of his subtle redesign, Weil resized the set so that when the eight primary pieces are lined up at the beginning of play, their angle reflects the pitch of the Pantheon’s pediment. Weil also streamlined the pieces somewhat, returning a precision and thoughtfulness to the Staunton set that, in his view, had been lost in many of the Staunton variations created over the last 160 years. The design also reflects the relative value of each piece according to tournament rules; the more a piece is worth, the wider the base. The new Staunton pieces were also designed to accommodate different styles of play, such as the grips that Weil ostentatiously refers to as the “north hold” and the more theatrical “south hold”. The high-quality set debuted in tournament play this year and is now also available to the public. Weill told Design Week, “When chess started to become popular in the 19th century it became a social showcase, so everyone had a set on show. I wanted to make an object of quality so that people could also show it off.”

Inspired by the Neoclassical architecture of Victorian London and a very modern need for standardization and mass production, the Staunton chessmen helped popularize the game and quickly became the world standard. The new Staunton pieces by Daniel Weil reinforces this architectural history of the original pieces while respecting their timeless design.

Read the full article at Design Decoded.

Related Content:


Herzog & de Meuron Unveil Tate 2: Electric Boogaloo

[left: original rendering. right: revised rendering]

Revised plans and renderings were recently unveiled of Herzog & de Meuron’s addition to London’s Tate Modern Museum, aka Tate 2. The original design (above left) was a little perplexing: a loosely stacked pile of metal and glass boxes, referred to by architecture critic Hugh Pearman as a “joyous asymmetrical gothic (composition).” The design was all the more striking in that it bore little relationship with the much-lauded original power station renovation. Even Pearman, in his joyous exuberance, questioned the additon’s cladding. “You have to wonder,” he wrote in 2006, “about the wisdom of a glass-clad building facing south – especially given that most of the gallery spaces inside will have to have solid walls. You wonder equally about the energy efficiency of all that broken-up surface area.” It seems that someone involved with the project agreed, as the new renderings reveal a structure that has seen a complete reskinning and has been smoothed out into less of a…heap.


Viñoly Unveils Renovation of London’s Battersea Power Station

Battersea Power Station

[image via BD Online]

This week saw Rafael Viñoly debut his proposed renovation of London’s much-loved Battersea Power Station. The design includes a massive tower and bizarre glassed-in micro-city / biodome that bears little to no relationship with the existing power plant and its context. Predictably, reviews have not been kind — the word “menace” has been thrown around a lot and RIBA chair Andrew Hanson has said “it’s completely overscaled and is destroying my memory of that part of London.” Wow. How bad can design be? So bad that it actually destroys memory. So bad that it makes architects forget that something could ever be good. The only people who don’t seem to be upset are those convinced it will never get built. “I might muster the energy to get offended by the project if I thought that there was even the remotest chance of it being built,” says BD’s architecture critic, Ellis Woodman, with typical British aplomb. The proposoal is ugly, yes. Perhaps even menacing. It does, however include one compelling feature: converting the original station into an actual functioning power plant.


David Adjaye’s Whitechapel Idea Store

As an unabashed fan of David Adjaye’s work, I was very much looking forward to visiting his Whitechapel Idea Store during my recent visit to London. My expectations were high, and I’m glad to say that the building most definitely did not disappoint.

The Idea Store – Adjaye’s work in general, really – show’s an incredible awareness of context. Although not as subtle as much of his work, the use of colored glass, drawn from vendor’s tents of the adjacent market, not only animates the exterior of the building, but also casts brilliant dynamic shadows on the interior.

The entrance to the building – or what should be the entrance to the building – projects out prominently over the sidewalk; further integrating the building within the neighborhood. An entry escalator slips between the sidewalk and the building – a liminal threshold from interior to exterior, that was closed, I was told, for “safety reasons.” No further explanations were offered.

Ample space is provided for the classrooms, studios, and workshops, but each programatic component isn’t necessarily relegated to a separate part of the building. Successfully integrating program elements in this manner seems like it will ensure that all floors are used, while prevent the manifestation of dead spaces.

Shelves and desks are integrated into the the building’s structural system and facade. Every component of the building seems to be supporting another. There is a definite sense of cohesion and coherence within the Whitechapel Idea Store that unfortunately, this seems to be lacking all to often in contemporary architecture.


Close Your Eyes and Think of England

London London London! Perhaps Oscar Wilde put it best: “I love London society! It is entirely composed now of beautiful idiots and brilliant lunatics. Just what Society should be!”I have to admit, after last week’s vacation, London’s dark and rainy days are tempting me from the fair skies of San Francisco. Guided by brilliant lunatics well-traveled through the forests of galleries and brick alleyways, I was led to the East, where crumbling buildings occasionaly part to reveal hidden contemporary gems. East! Where I spent my days peering through the windows of David Adjaye’s buildings and my nights peeping through the windows of Gilbert & George’s flat. When I was previously in London, I must admit that I never ventured too far from center of the city or the comfort of a well-established museum. So it was a true pleasure to see some different parts of the city, where beautiful decay, hidden galleries, and closed tube stations were follies in picturesque gardens of brick.The skyline bursting with cranes, London looks like a postwar city. I had no idea there was so much construction! The booming economy and approaching Olympics are changing the face of London and it seems like an incredible time to be working there.I think I’ll be digesting everything I saw (and drank) for quite some time. A couple more London posts are surely forthcoming, but for now, a 7-photo summary of my trip: